", BUT what's going on with code samples? Let's take a look: In MedievalButton example (as well as all over the samples) author using InvalidateVisual() method in each possible hole. What do you think will happend with performance? I'm not very experienced in WPF, but prety know CPP and C# programming. Invalidate context each time is VERY BAD CONCEPT, but maybe I'm wrong
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Applications = code + markup
Got first really good WPF book of Charles Petzold "Applications = Code + Markup", BUT what's going on with code samples? Let's take a look: In MedievalButton example (as well as all over the samples) author using InvalidateVisual() method in each possible hole. What do you think will happend with performance? I'm not very experienced in WPF, but prety know CPP and C# programming. Invalidate context each time is VERY BAD CONCEPT, but maybe I'm wrong
", BUT what's going on with code samples? Let's take a look: In MedievalButton example (as well as all over the samples) author using InvalidateVisual() method in each possible hole. What do you think will happend with performance? I'm not very experienced in WPF, but prety know CPP and C# programming. Invalidate context each time is VERY BAD CONCEPT, but maybe I'm wrong
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment